Tyler Too

Solving The Chinese Puzzle

By Gus Tyler

  • Print
  • Share Share

Last year, the United States ran a trade deficit of $232 billion with China. The Congress of the United States is enraged and wants China to open up its market to products “made in America.”

The first question to be asked is just how it has happened that China has such a huge trade surplus with the United States. The answer is painfully apparent. It was — and is — due to the policy of American corporations that closed their factories in the U.S. to get their work done in China where there was an inexhaustible supply of very cheap labor.

The finished products were made for sale in America. Hence, the huge U.S. trade deficit with China.

In short, the prime responsibility for the huge trade deficits with China was, and is, in the first instance, the policies of American companies.

What can be done about this?

To begin with, China has promised that it will expand its purchases of U.S. products by $30 billion this year. Just how this will be accomplished has not been spelled out. But one way would be for the Chinese to produce more than originally planned for the American market and to sell that surplus in China and remit the income to the U.S.

The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Henry M. Paulson Jr., according to The New York Times, proposes to make more room for U.S, passengers and cargo, granting U.S. financial services access to Chinese customers and clearing way for the sale of energy technologies to China.

In short, the mess in China created by the “outsourcing” practices of American corporations is not likely to be cleared up easily. Solving The Chinese Puzzle

Last year, the United States ran a trade deficit of $232 billion with China. The Congress of the United States is enraged and wants China to open up its market to products “made in America.”

The first question to be asked is just how it has happened that China has such a huge trade surplus with the United States. The answer is painfully apparent. It was — and is — due to the policy of American corporations that closed their factories in the U.S. to get their work done in China where there was an inexhaustible supply of very cheap labor.

The finished products were made for sale in America. Hence, the huge U.S. trade deficit with China.

In short, the prime responsibility for the huge trade deficits with China was, and is, in the first instance, the policies of American companies.

What can be done about this?

To begin with, China has promised that it will expand its purchases of U.S. products by $30 billion this year. Just how this will be accomplished has not been spelled out. But one way would be for the Chinese to produce more than originally planned for the American market and to sell that surplus in China and remit the income to the U.S.

The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Henry M. Paulson Jr., according to The New York Times, proposes to make more room for U.S, passengers and cargo, granting U.S. financial services access to Chinese customers and clearing way for the sale of energy technologies to China.

In short, the mess in China created by the “outsourcing” practices of American corporations is not likely to be cleared up easily.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: Economics

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • "Dear Diaspora Jews, I’m sorry to break it to you, but you can’t have it both ways. You can’t insist that every Jew is intrinsically part of the Israeli state and that Jews are also intrinsically separate from, and therefore not responsible for, the actions of the Israeli state." Do you agree?
  • Are Michelangelo's paintings anti-Semitic? Meet the Jews of the Sistine Chapel: http://jd.fo/i4UDl
  • What does the Israel-Hamas war look like through Haredi eyes?
  • Was Israel really shocked to find there are networks of tunnels under Gaza?
  • “Going to Berlin, I had a sense of something waiting there for me. I was searching for something and felt I could unlock it by walking the streets where my grandfather walked and where my father grew up.”
  • How can 3 contradictory theories of Yiddish co-exist? Share this with Yiddish lovers!
  • "We must answer truthfully: Has a drop of all this bloodshed really helped bring us to a better place?”
  • "There are two roads. We have repeatedly taken the one more traveled, and that has made all the difference." Dahlia Scheindlin looks at the roots of Israel's conflict with Gaza.
  • Shalom, Cooperstown! Cooperstown Jewish mayor Jeff Katz and Jeff Idelson, director of the National Baseball Hall of Fame, work together to oversee induction weekend.
  • A boost for morale, if not morals.
  • Mixed marriages in Israel are tough in times of peace. So, how do you maintain a family bubble in the midst of war? http://jd.fo/f4VeG
  • Despite the escalating violence in Israel, more and more Jews are leaving their homes in Alaska to make aliyah: http://jd.fo/g4SIa
  • The Workmen's Circle is hosting New York’s first Jewish street fair on Sunday. Bring on the nouveau deli!
  • Novelist Sayed Kashua finds it hard to write about the heartbreak of Gaza from the plush confines of Debra Winger's Manhattan pad. Tough to argue with that, whichever side of the conflict you are on.
  • "I’ve never bought illegal drugs, but I imagine a small-time drug deal to feel a bit like buying hummus underground in Brooklyn."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.