The Arty Semite

Hero in Print, Villain at Home

By Allen Ellenzweig

  • Print
  • Share Share

Few of us ever face a moral decision with life or death consequences, or that threatens to influence, however feebly, the course of history. This may be one reason why the moral calculations of men and women who lived during the rise of the Third Reich and the Second World War prove so durable as the subject of literature and film.

“The Last Sentence,” director Jan Troell’s account of a renowned Swedish newspaper editor, Torgny Segerstedt, who wrote early and forcefully against Hitler in his editorials, presents us with one such man. Yet instead of portraying this valorous figure as totally heroic, Troell does something more complicated — he presents a man whose personal life contains a strong dose of moral failure.

From Troell’s earliest frames, shot in the classic black and white of the period in question, we are in the hands of a master film craftsman. (Troell is best known in America for his award winning “The Emigrants” and “The New Land.”) Simple but compelling images of leaves floating on the surface of a clear shallow stream strike a poetic but also a philosophical note: Is the image a reminder of the way in which most of us “float” on the surface of life led by imperceptible currents?

One hesitates to make too much of this, especially once the story proper begins. Torgny is already a man past middle age, with a mane of carefully combed white hair thrust off his high forehead. In the dignified stature of the handsome Danish actor Jesper Christensen, Torgny is at once a combative intellectual and writer-polemicist, fearless in attacking Hitler mere days after his ascension: “Herr Hitler är en förolämpning” (“Mr. Hitler is an insult”) he begins an article. The challenge has been laid down, and Hermann Göring responds with a threatening telegram. Axel Forssman, Torgny’s publisher and close friend, backs his aggressive stance and allows his editorialist to proceed in a further published response to Göring’s telegram.

But “The Last Sentence” does not settle for a narrative about an unstained noble crusader. Torgny’s complicated marriage to Augusta “Puste,” the mother of his several children who is haunted by the early death of an adult son, reveals Torgny Segerstedt to be a man at war with private duty.

Torgny is having an affair with Axel Forssman’s wife Maja, a vivacious and cultivated Jewish woman of charm, intelligence, and political conviction. Their liaison, as well a meeting of like minds, is barely hidden from their respective spouses — and only slightly less evident to their upper-crust intellectual set. It proceeds in plain sight at dinners and parties, where Maja arranges to seat herself always at Torgny’s side, even if it means pushing Puste off to the margins. Even Torgny seems indifferent to the public embarrassment of his wife, and to her private dependence on drugs; he is far more attentive to his three dogs who run alongside him, ever eager for his affection and approval. Like Puste, Torgny, too, is haunted: but in his case by the mother he adored, who comes to him as a ghost-figure of death in his dreams. Loved by this beautiful woman as a boy, the aging Torgny seems helpless before the sexual promptings of women who revere him for the brave intellectual he has become.

The slow revelation of how these two couples of mature years have arranged their roundelay is the heart of the film’s first half. Meanwhile, the growing geopolitical menace — the pinching of Sweden between Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany, as Stalin and Hitler come to their short-lived pact — plays as a backdrop to the private maneuvers of these sophisticated grown-ups. Lest we forget, Troell intercuts period newsreel footage at opportune moments.

If Hitler and the rise of Nazism at times take a back seat, the film returns eventually to the costs Torgny is willing to risk for his outspokenness — aided by Axel, his putative private rival. Torgny’s published defiance is also meant as a defense of Swedish honor, for as his country’s “neutrality” becomes formalized, the editorialist finds himself fighting his homeland’s entrenched establishment, including King Gustaf V, who fears for Sweden’s security in the face of Nazi aggression.

With Puste’s death, Maja’s position becomes even more elevated, with no evident damage to the enduring friendship between Torgny and Axel. Indeed, the film’s portrayal of a dying social caste with its upper-class rituals of formal dinners and at-home “musicales,” with socially imposed evening dress and a gentleman’s forbearance at being cuckolded by his otherwise honorable best friend — all these elements remind us that the entre-deux-guerre among the sophisticated European gentry was still a moment in which vestiges of 19th-century social forms were honored. This was so even as the world witnessed increasing 20th-century barbarity.

Troell’s film is a compelling portrait of a complex man fighting a lonely battle against an implacably evil foe. These days, we normally go to fantasy films to see such a battle waged, often played out in images of handsome knights in magical universes. But Troell is not playing in the world of dystopian or future fantasy, but in a traumatic past, receding to a pinpoint as its last survivors die off; it was an historic moment as real as our own where even good people lived ethically imperfect lives.

Played by a distinguished cast — in addition to Jesper Christensen as Torgny, there is Pernilla August as Maja, Ulla Skoog as Puste, and Björn Granath as Axel — “The Last Sentence” takes the measure of a good but by no means stainless man in a society eagerly protecting its prerogatives. Given the gravity of the period in which it is set, the film has a surprisingly ironic but not exactly buoyant tone. It is a master work from a director in the late autumn of his career.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: Film, Jan Troell, The Last Sentence, Torgny Segerstedt

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • We try to show things that get less exposed to the public here. We don’t look to document things that are nice or that people would like. We don’t try to show this place as a beautiful place.”
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.