Sisterhood Blog

Why Elle Magazine Isn’t Taken Seriously

By Liz Prato

  • Print
  • Share Share

Can women’s magazines produce serious journalism? The Twitterverse and Facebook have been abuzz trying to answer this very question over the past week, in response to British magazine Port’s choice of showing all male editors on their “new golden age of journalism” issue.

Thinkstock

I learned about the debate on Facebook via Robbie Meyers, Elle Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief. In her August 2013 editor’s letter, Meyers asserts that Elle consistently publishes important political and social commentary, including long-form reportage on Barack Obama, and an article about expectant mothers choosing selective reduction in twin pregnancies. She is indignant that Elle is not taken seriously as a journalistic venue, and cites several men – from important editors to a clueless college student – who perpetuate this attitude. Topics in men’s magazines are more frequently regarded as significant, Meyer says. She cites Elle’s aggregate readership of 8 million women, rightly proposing that to dismiss subjects aimed at female readers as unimportant is to denigrate women. “It might be time for some non-women to crack open a magazine edited for half the population,” she suggests.

As a writer and a feminist, I am passionate about stamping out the gender bias in publishing (painstakingly documented by VIDA). “You go, girl!” I wanted to shout out to Ms. Meyers. But something confused me: I’ve always considered Elle a beauty and fashion magazine, focused on physical appearance. Did I have the wrong impression?

I examined the cover of the issue in which Ms. Meyer’s letter appears, and here’s what jumped out at me: SEXY HAIR and 220+ BAGS, SHOES, JEWELRY. Next I noticed “50 Perfect Swimsuits,” and FEEL HOT. The cover model is actress Kerry Washington, wearing tight fitting shorts revealing a whole lot of leg. Ms. Washington’s lips are pursed, her eyes hooded, and she is posed in that “come hither” way. I failed to find one single cover story matching Ms. Meyers definition of “serious journalism.” I Googled past Elle covers and was bombarded with captions for “The Great Makeup Makeover,” and “The Best Hair Ever,” and “No Anesthesia Cosmetic Surgery.” Where was the serious journalism Meyers is condemning others for not noticing?

To be clear: women who care about social and political issues can also desire cute handbags and the perfect lipstick. Just because Elle promotes one, doesn’t mean they cannot also promote the other. But it appears that Elle’s editors make a conscious choice to not market their serious journalistic stories to potential readers. When I mentioned this on Facebook, a reader pointed out that magazines like Esquire have similar covers but are nonetheless taken seriously. So, off to view Esquire covers I went.

Esquire does have captions like “Lethal Suits for Summer,” “Look Good in Golf Gear,” and “Encyclopedia of Sandwiches.” We can all agree that these stories do not amount to “serious” journalism, right? But Esquire covers also feature titles like “Obama’s Killing Problem,” “What’s Left of Our War in Iraq?” and “Ten Years Later: The World Trade Center.” Now, we need not run out and pat Esquire on the back. After all, these more substantive captions generally appear on covers depicting men; if a (scantily clad) woman is the cover model, she quite possibly has SEX printed across her body. But it seems clear that if Esquire is being taken more seriously, one reason might be because they purposefully market themselves that way. Elle does not.

Magazines covers are meant to attract an audience by quickly giving readers a sense of what the magazine is about. Simple. For Meyers to not address the disconnect between the way Elle promotes itself and how it is perceived strikes me as naive, at best. I’m guessing Meyers, with an illustrious career at publications like Rolling Stone, InStyle, Seventeen, and Interview Magazine, is not remotely naive when it comes to the effects of promotion and marketing. For that matter, I have to believe that anyone who worked with Andy Warhol intimately understands how marketing creates perception, and how perception creates reality. Every single aspect of an Elle cover creates the perception that it is solely about women’s fashion and beauty; ergo, that perception becomes public reality.

My knee jerk reaction was to assume Meyers was disingenuous. But I suspect she’s not. I suspect she really wants her magazine to be recognized for its journalistic achievements, and is genuinely pissed that women’s interests are often regarded as insignificant. What I wonder, though, is if she really believes she has done nothing to perpetuate this problem? It seems she is unable to face her own role, her own onus, in manufacturing this perception. Her immediate response to the debate was to create a Twitter hashtag promoting long-form journalism by female authors. It’s a start. But if she really wants Elle to be regarded as a venue for serious reporting, she might want to push “The Secret to the Best Behind Ever” off the cover in favor of Obama, reproductive issues and – how about this – the topic of gender bias in publishing.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.