Sisterhood Blog

What 'Having it All' Really Means

By Elissa Strauss

  • Print
  • Share Share

One of the threads of the heated discussion surrounding Anne-Marie Slaughter’s new Atlantic article, “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All,” is whether feminists should rid themselves of the phrase “having it all.”

Rebecca Traister at Salon writes:

Here is what is wrong, what has always been wrong, with equating feminist success with “having it all”: It’s a misrepresentation of a revolutionary social movement. The notion that female achievement should be measured by women’s ability to “have it all” recasts a righteous struggle for greater political, economic, social, sexual and political parity as a piggy and acquisitive project.

Lindy West at Jezebel adds:

First of all, nobody’s happy. Nobody “has it all”— not women, not men, not presidents, not heiresses, not babies, not kittens (maybe kittens). The idea that there is one homogeneous definition of “it all” that all women are supposed to desire is painfully reductive.

While I agree with the larger points Traister and West make in their responses, I would like to defend the use of the term “having it all” on behalf of the many feminists who, like me, totally got it.

Never once did I think that having it all, meant, literally, “it all.” I didn’t expect a high-paying, well-respected job that only required me to work 8 hour days. I never foresaw a highly supportive boss who encouraged me to work from home or take the afternoon off when my child needed it. I never expected the same things for my husband, who, would take delight in his flexibility and surprise me at the carpool line on a Friday afternoon, after which we would spend the rest of the day eating ice cream in the park and hearing our child talk about his hopes and dreams.

I never imagined a life free of guilt or stress, but full of easy-to-prepare, ecologically sustainable meals after which my independent but adoring children insist on cleaning up. I never believed that managing daycare, school and summer camp with work would require anything less than the precision of a high-operations military unit on behalf of my husband and me. Lastly, I never thought squeezing in yoga, sunset jogs, or weekends away with friends would be effortless.

Instead, when I heard the phrase “have it all,” I thought it meant, very simply, “have all the opportunities.” This is what, as I understand it, feminism has pursued and is still pursuing.

Never, ever, have I been so foolish that I ignored the fact that, at some point or another, “work” and “life,” or career and family, is a zero-sum game. All the subsidized daycare, flexible work-schedules and supportive partners in the world can’t undo the fact that we can’t be in two places at once. At some point, all of us, will have to choose. There is no perfect solution, and especially not a one-size-fits-all one.

Still, even though we can’t have it all at once, we can have it all in terms of choices and options that allow us, all of us, men and women, to organize our lives in the best way possible.

Here is my list of “it all” as I see it when it comes to improving work-life balance.

•A reliable system of childcare support, whether provided by the government, employer, family members, private facilities or home-care — whatever works for the individual family. Though we all should be able to have a few options. Today most of us have only expensive private facilities or home-care to choose from.

•An end to “time macho” work culture, as Slaughter refers to it. Research does not support the idea that working longer hours and weekends makes us produce higher quality work. Nor does my California upbringing, where I witnessed many people do just-fine while incorporating leisure into their lives. (Slaughter even gives a special shout-out to California in the piece. “California is the cradle of American innovation—in technology, entertainment, sports, food, and lifestyles. It is also a place where people take leisure as seriously as they take work; where companies like Google deliberately encourage play, with Ping-Pong tables, light sabers, and policies that require employees to spend one day a week working on whatever they wish.“ So take that, busy east-coasters.) No more 12 hour work days. Humans made it pretty far without this 24/7 work culture. Quantity is not quality.

•A general shift as a society on valuing parenting and understanding that good parents create good citizens, which benefits us all. Instead of saying, “Oh man, Judy can’t make the 5 o’clock meeting because she has to go to her kid’s piano recital,” supervisors will simply say, “Judy can’t make it to the meeting,” with the implication that her support of her child is vital for giving him or a her a healthy self-esteem. And then we all win.

•Fathers who really, really care about parenting. Like so much so that they blog and write columns about it, and swap tips in the elevator and during breaks in their basketball games.

•Paid parental leave. To me it makes as much sense as paved roads, and science pretty much backs me up on this one. Let’s make it a priority.

•Workplaces that really, truly understand that there is not yet parity between the sexes and actively try to counter any subtle harassment or overt sexism that may be taking place in their offices.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: Feminism, Work-Life Balance

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.