Sisterhood Blog

IVF Babies Denied U.S. Citizenship

By Allison Kaplan Sommer

  • Print
  • Share Share
istock
Are those eggs USDA-approved?

For American-Israeli women like me, having a baby means a trip to the U.S. Embassy. Once you are home from the hospital, and once your newborn’s Israeli birth certificate is granted and health care benefits are in order, you head to the embassy to apply for U.S. citizenship on behalf of your infant.

With the U.S. passport (replete with a funny-looking newborn passport pic) in hand, you can relax knowing you won’t face visa headaches when it’s time to take your bundle of joy to America so the grandparents can kvell.

Convenience is, of course, only one of the reasons that American parents anywhere in the world want to quickly establish the automatic U.S. citizenship granted to kids with at least one parent who is a citizen. In a post-9/11 world, American citizenship and the ability to travel freely in and out of the U.S. is not something to be taken for granted.

When I went through the process for my three Israeli-born children, my biggest worries were getting the diaper bag through embassy security and filling out the forms coherently on very little sleep. But mothers who had their babies using assisted reproductive technology, such as in vitro fertilization, are now facing a much bigger and more serious problem: Many of these children are being denied citizenship altogether.

As Michele Chabin reports in USA Today, the U.S. government is actively enforcing a regulation that forces parents to prove that either the egg or the sperm used to create the embryo that resulted in their child was the biological material of a U.S. citizen. The fact that an American woman carried that embryo in her womb, gave birth, and is raising the child is not enough to qualify the baby for citizenship.

The regulation states: “A child born outside the USA to an American cannot receive citizenship until a biological link with at least one parent is established.” Children who are legally adopted are specifically exempt from the rule, but IVF babies from donor eggs are not.

Ellie Lavi, who lives in Israel but is originally from Chicago, was quoted in the USA Today article as being “humiliated and horrified,” when an embassy clerk told her that her twin girls could not become citizens unless Lavi could prove that they came from her eggs.

Lavi, like other women who were grilled regarding their children’s biological origins, believes she was ‘profiled’ for questioning, since she was a single woman in her 40s with twins. Such profiling is clearly unfair and discriminatory; such questions invasive, and show little respect for privacy.

And “proving” biological heritage is no easy task. If these rules remain in place, pre-warned parents will begin lying, and then what? As a matter of course, paternity and maternity tests could potentially become necessary for making a baby a U.S. citizen.

These rules are simply bizarre. What counts is the biological material, not the actual parent. Presumably, a non-American citizen of any nationality — British, French, Israeli, Saudi Arabian — could give birth to a baby, and if she was able to prove that either its donor eggs or sperm came from a U.S. citizen, the child would get American citizenship.

The loophole has the potential for creating a new hi-tech ‘anchor baby.’ Foreign women could fly to the U.S., get pregnant by an American sperm and/or donor eggs, fly back home, and give birth to a little U.S. citizen without any real American parent. This is exactly the kind of fraud that the rules were set up to prevent.

The one ray of hope in the USA Today article is the fact that the State Department “is studying whether it can interpret the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow U.S. citizen parents to “transmit American citizenship to their children born abroad through artificial reproductive technology in a broader range of circumstances.”

I hope they study hard. And quick. And draw the necessary conclusions, and change the rules accordingly. Clearly, this situation has the potential to affect thousands of parents and children. It is a particular problem in Israel, where many Americans live, and which has a statistically large number of people who take advantage of state-subsidized fertility treatments. So it is no surprise that Israel is where the issue has come to light. But with so many new ways to make a baby, a decision by the U.S. government to bring the rules up to date will help Americans everywhere.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: Israel, Infertility, IVF, Citizenship

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • "Mark your calendars: It was on Sunday, July 20, that the momentum turned against Israel." J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis on Israel's ground operation in Gaza:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.