Sisterhood Blog

What Photoshopping Women Out of Photos Is Really About

By Elana Maryles Sztokman

  • Print
  • Share Share

I have this pet peeve about women sending emails from their husbands’ email accounts. Although this was probably more of a common phenomenon towards the beginning of the e-mail era, I still get emails like this, and it drives me crazy.

The hiding of women behind men is not as uncommon as we would perhaps like to believe. I remember getting a sales call a few months ago from a carpet-cleaning agency in which the saleswoman (!) said to me, “Would you like to go ask your husband if it’s okay?” Or like the time I got really angry at our mortgage bank for calling me up to tell me that they have a present for my husband’s 40th birthday. How exciting, I said to them — and what about me? I had turned 40 just two months earlier. This clerk went searching around her papers and said she’s sorry, that only my husband’s information is listed in the computer. I signed the mortgage papers, too, I tried to tell her. But there I was, deleted as an entity by someone punching information into a machine. All these situations are the same, really: It’s all about women’s invisibility.

I thought about this amid this week’s brouhaha over Der Tzitung’s notorious erasure of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from the iconic photo of the national security team getting an update on the bin Laden raid.

This episode generated discussions all over the place about what this means for Orthodoxy or ultra-Orthodoxy — whether this is done by extremists or not, who is segregating their community from whom, and what the photoshopping of women is all about anyway. The idea that this is about “modesty” is thankfully beginning to erode (maybe).

The photoshopping of Clinton is indeed part of the larger Orthodox phenomenon of removing women from public spaces, silencing women’s voices, covering women’s bodies, and pretending women don’t exist. This is about creating a woman-free world, enabling men to walk through the universe knowing that they will never have to encounter a woman.

That said, the society in which Der Tzitung’s actions are seen as “normal” is not as distinct from everyone else as we would like to believe. Western society still has a seemingly infinite number of tools for rendering women’s lives invisible. Open up the business pages of most newspapers any day and you will be hard-pressed to find women represented either in imagery or subject matter. The sports pages are even worse, as women’s accomplishments are often ignored completely. Thought journals are still missing women, as The Sisterhood recently reported. Boardrooms, too, are often missing women entirely, despite legislative efforts to change that reality. Although one might be tempted to argue that it is not true in western life that women are invisible — after all, women’s heavily made-up and sexualized faces and bodies are overly visible, used to sell every product imaginable — the commercial manipulation of the female form does not compensate for the real erasure of women’s lives in the realms that actually matter. The deletion of women is not just an ultra-Orthodox problem. It’s a society-wide problem.

For me, then, there are two lessons from this story. One is, the Jewish community needs to stop using the word “modesty” to justify an ideal of women’s invisibility. Two is, rather than self-righteously laughing off what “they” have done to women, we should be looking at our own societies and asking ourselves if we are as distinct from ultra-Orthodoxy as we would like to believe when it comes to the erasure of women’s lives.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: Photoshop, Modesty, Misogyny, Der Tzitung

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • “I don’t want to say, ‘Oh oh, I’m not Jewish,’ because when you say that, you sound like someone trying to get into a 1950s country club, “and I love the idea of being Jewish." Are you a fan of Seth Meyers?
  • "If you want my advice: more Palestinians, more checkpoints, just more reality." What do you think?
  • Happy birthday Barbra Streisand! Our favorite Funny Girl turns 72 today.
  • Clueless parenting advice from the star of "Clueless."
  • Why won't the city give an answer?
  • BREAKING NEWS: Israel has officially suspended peace talks with the Palestinians.
  • Can you guess what the most boring job in the army is?
  • What the foolish rabbi of Chelm teaches us about Israel and the Palestinian unity deal:
  • Mazel tov to Idina Menzel on making Variety "Power of Women" cover! http://jd.fo/f3Mms
  • "How much should I expect him and/or ask him to participate? Is it enough to have one parent reciting the prayers and observing the holidays?" What do you think?
  • New York and Montreal have been at odds for far too long. Stop the bagel wars, sign our bagel peace treaty!
  • Really, can you blame them?
  • “How I Stopped Hating Women of the Wall and Started Talking to My Mother.” Will you see it?
  • Taglit-Birthright Israel is redefining who they consider "Jewish" after a 17% drop in registration from 2011-2013. Is the "propaganda tag" keeping young people away?
  • Happy birthday William Shakespeare! Turns out, the Bard knew quite a bit about Jews.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.