Sisterhood Blog

Sonia Peres, Reluctant Political Wife, Passes Away

By Allison Kaplan Sommer

  • Print
  • Share Share

Sonia Peres, wife of Israeli President Shimon Peres, died January 20 as she had lived — quietly and privately, as far as she could get from the spotlight enjoyed by her gregarious, political husband. She was 87.

She died in her modest apartment in suburban Ramat Aviv, far from the grandeur of the presidential residence. The Peres marriage, particularly in its later years, always seemed to be a terribly sad story. The relationship was not scandal-ridden, but it seemed that two very good and well-meaning people were terribly mismatched: Sonia clearly hated public attention as intensely as Shimon craved it.

For most of Shimon Peres’s political career, there seemed to be a quiet truce: He didn’t impose a public life on his wife, and she didn’t demand his presence beside her at home. There were those who sympathized with what appeared to be her shyness, and believed that her desire not to be part of her husband’s public political life was a sign of dignity and a desire to lead a simple, quiet life, and that it was a position that deserved respect.

Critics felt that Sonia Peres’s lack of support for her husband’s public service career seemed selfish, and many Israelis pitied Shimon Peres, who had to show up solo at important ceremonial events. His political allies felt that his wife’s refusal to cooperate with the media and appear with him publicly hurt his career and reinforced his image as cold.

Biographer Michael Bar-Zohar wrote that Sonia’s nonparticipation played a role in Shimon’s political defeat in 1981 and that, had she been so inclined, Sonia’s “charming personality would have undoubtedly added another dimension to her husband, and instead of the slightly sad, lonely man, many would have seen a loving and warm couple.”

As one of the pioneering generation of Israeli women, Sonia Peres doesn’t appear to have shied away from challenge and danger in her youth, as this profile describes.

In May 1942, Sonia Gelman, 18, enlisted in the British army. Nazi general Rommel’s forces were advancing toward Tel Aviv, and although her friends joined the Palmach, young Sonia believed that the Germans were a more immediate threat. She said, “I realized that this was the Jewish people’s war and that I had to do my part. I always dreamt of being a nurse in a hospital, and I requested to serve in this function.”

About 100 nurses from the Land of Israel then served at the hospital in Halmia, near Cairo…. In the end, Peres was forced to leave the hospital and was sent to a camp, where she learned to drive trucks, ambulances, command cars and even tanks.

After the war, Shimon Peres and Sonia Gelman married and became founding members of Kibbutz Alumot, where she gave birth to their three children. This is not exactly the biography of a shrinking violet — the Israeli public’s image of her because of her absence from her husband’s side. Some feminist commentators defended her right to decide not to participate in her husband’s political career as a sign of strength and independence. When she was criticized for not showing up for his swearing-in as president in 2007, one wrote:

Over many decades, Sonia Peres chose, and continues to choose, to be a private person. All the attempts of the media and the public pressure have not gotten her to change her approach. She does not have to apologize for her independent position. On the contrary, she can serve as a model for many women who do not want to be the type of “wife-of” a public figure — women who do not want their daily routine or what they have to say to be dictated by the job of their spouse. They have their own lives and they want to live them to the full.

But Sonia Peres’s absence from her husband’s presidential swearing-in turned out to be only the beginning of a separation that seemed to evolve into a de facto divorce. Press reports said that his refusal to retire with her at a time when her health was failing, and his agreement to take the presidency when it was offered to him, was the breaking point in her patience. She didn’t merely choose to remain in Ramat Aviv — she cut her husband out of her life completely. He was no longer invited to family Sabbath dinners, and the media reported on his solitary weekends in the president’s mansion, alone with his staff and his books.

He clearly didn’t like to discuss his strained marriage with the media, but he did on occasion, acknowledging the impasse the couple had reached:

When you’re 16 you’re different from an 87-year-old person. Why should we hide it? We lived together for 70 years…. I have a lot of respect for her and for her desires. But just like she can set her agenda, I can set my own agenda. It reached a situation in which it no longer felt right.

Whatever love Peres had for his wife was not enough to curtail his ambition and his desire to remain on the political playing field. And she apparently could not forgive him for that. It was only after her passing that he was finally allowed to get close to her, as the Israeli press reported.

Upon word of his wife’s death, the president left his Jerusalem residence and headed toward their joint home in northern Tel Aviv. He entered her room alone and kissed her goodbye.

Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: Sonia Peres, Shimon Peres

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • "Despite the great pain and sadness surrounding a captured soldier, this should not shape the face of this particular conflict – not in making concessions and not in negotiations, not in sobering assessments of this operation’s achievements or the need to either retreat or move forward." Do you agree?
  • Why genocide is always wrong, period. And the fact that some are talking about it shows just how much damage the war in Gaza has already done.
  • Construction workers found a 75-year-old deli sign behind a closing Harlem bodega earlier this month. Should it be preserved?
  • "The painful irony in Israel’s current dilemma is that it has been here before." Read J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis of the conflict:
  • Law professor Dan Markel waited a shocking 19 minutes for an ambulance as he lay dying after being ambushed in his driveway. Read the stunning 911 transcript as neighbor pleaded for help.
  • Happy birthday to the Boy Who Lived! July 31 marks the day that Harry Potter — and his creator, J.K. Rowling — first entered the world. Harry is a loyal Gryffindorian, a matchless wizard, a native Parseltongue speaker, and…a Jew?
  • "Orwell would side with Israel for building a flourishing democracy, rather than Hamas, which imposed a floundering dictatorship. He would applaud the IDF, which warns civilians before bombing them in a justified war, not Hamas terrorists who cower behind their own civilians, target neighboring civilians, and planned to swarm civilian settlements on the Jewish New Year." Read Gil Troy's response to Daniel May's opinion piece:
  • "My dear Penelope, when you accuse Israel of committing 'genocide,' do you actually know what you are talking about?"
  • What's for #Shabbat dinner? Try Molly Yeh's coconut quinoa with dates and nuts. Recipe here:
  • Can animals suffer from PTSD?
  • Is anti-Zionism the new anti-Semitism?
  • "I thought I was the only Jew on a Harley Davidson, but I was wrong." — Gil Paul, member of the Hillel's Angels.
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • That sound you hear? That's your childhood going up in smoke.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.