Sisterhood Blog

The Jewish Group Behind the Nanny Bill of Rights

By Elissa Strauss

  • Print
  • Share Share

During the past eight years, Jews for Racial and Economic Justice has been a key ally in Domestic Workers United’s fight for fair treatment of housekeepers, nannies and other caregivers. As part of its Shalom Bayit [peace in the home] campaign, JFREJ has assisted the organization in determining best practices for employers of domestic workers, and joined DWU in Albany to lobby for a domestic workers bill of rights. Now their work is paying off.

The New York Senate earlier this month passed the bill of rights, a year after the Assembly passed a similar bill. The legislation affords domestic workers — nannies, housekeepers and home assistants — basic workplace rights, such as termination notice and sick pay, as well as legal recourse to take action against an abusive employer. Domestic workers were not included by President Roosevelt in the National Labor Relations Act, and have since been excluded from the protections given to most other workers in the United States.

Sarah Fields, program coordinator at JFREJ, spoke recently The Sisterhood about the organization’s involvement in the campaign for domestic workers’ rights.

Elissa Strauss: When did JFREJ get involved with domestic workers’ rights?

Sarah Fields: In 2002, JFREJ began working with Domestic Workers United. In 2003 and 2004, JFREJ helped pass a New York City Council resolution for domestic workers rights. JFREJ was the only ally organization that DWU felt both shared their political vision and had access to employer communities.

How has JFREJ been involved?

Shalom Bayit developed a vision of altering power relations between domestic workers and employers by advocating for change in employment practices and empowering community members to speak out and educate each other and the community at large about Jewish values and domestic labor. JFREJ began to reach out to employers, specifically to try and get them to begin using a standard contract. We also began reaching out to synagogue communities, where employment of domestic work was common.

We also organized the Employers for Justice Network, which is a group of approximately 100 employers of domestic workers, who have improved their employment practices and taken action in support of the Domestic Workers’ bill of rights.

So what is the Employers for Justice Network and how can people get involved?

These are employers who have committed to taking one step up in their employment practices — this could be in salary, sick days, vacation time, holidays, conversations with their employees, a contract, environmentally friendly cleaning products, etc. They improve their own practices and then often have living room gatherings where they invite their employer friends over to engage on the issue and get them to improve practices as well. Then they lobby, speak at rallies, public hearings. … People can get involved with the Employers for Justice Network by contacting JFREJ and connecting with the campaign’s organizers.

What challenges did you face when trying to educate employers about the way to treat their domestic employees?

Many people don’t to see themselves as employers or their homes as workplaces. Our analysis says this is a feminist problem as people don’t consider the home as a place of work because domestic work is not real work, but rather the work of women.

So it is fair to say we’ve had a fair amount of resistance and continue to see it even in the debate in the Senate. Other problems come from employers’ worries and hesitations about the logistics of implementing changes in their relationships. The shift in pay or treatment can be a real adjustment in their spending and budgeting, but we make sure to emphasize worker justice and proper employment ethics as one of the central values of all employer-employee relationships.

Do you have any personal connection to this work?

For me, as a woman who grew up in a time in which I was told I could “have it all,” part of me connected with the idea of the fact that another group of women work to make that dream possible. More specifically, growing up my parents made a particular point of not hiring someone to work in their home.

My grandparents were longtime employers of a housekeeper and I now realize they were model employers. My grandfather, as the owner of a medium-sized business and my grandmother, active in her teachers’ union, saw their housekeeper as an employee, who they paid social security for, gave time off to and tried to treat well. Many of the younger members of our campaign grew up in homes with domestic workers in which there was little discussion surrounding such employment.

What’s next for the Shalom Bayit campaign?

The next step is to get the bill of rights into law in New York State. The Senate passage last week was, of course, huge, but not the end of the road. Presently, the assembly bill needs to be reconciled with the Senate bill and then once that happens Gov. Paterson will then need to sign the bill into law — something we are confident he will do.

Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: JFREJ, Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, Nannies, Sarah Fields, Housekeepers, Domestic Workers

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Why genocide is always wrong, period. And the fact that some are talking about it shows just how much damage the war in Gaza has already done.
  • Construction workers found a 75-year-old deli sign behind a closing Harlem bodega earlier this month. Should it be preserved?
  • "The painful irony in Israel’s current dilemma is that it has been here before." Read J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis of the conflict:
  • Law professor Dan Markel waited a shocking 19 minutes for an ambulance as he lay dying after being ambushed in his driveway. Read the stunning 911 transcript as neighbor pleaded for help.
  • Happy birthday to the Boy Who Lived! July 31 marks the day that Harry Potter — and his creator, J.K. Rowling — first entered the world. Harry is a loyal Gryffindorian, a matchless wizard, a native Parseltongue speaker, and…a Jew?
  • "Orwell would side with Israel for building a flourishing democracy, rather than Hamas, which imposed a floundering dictatorship. He would applaud the IDF, which warns civilians before bombing them in a justified war, not Hamas terrorists who cower behind their own civilians, target neighboring civilians, and planned to swarm civilian settlements on the Jewish New Year." Read Gil Troy's response to Daniel May's opinion piece:
  • "My dear Penelope, when you accuse Israel of committing 'genocide,' do you actually know what you are talking about?"
  • What's for #Shabbat dinner? Try Molly Yeh's coconut quinoa with dates and nuts. Recipe here:
  • Can animals suffer from PTSD?
  • Is anti-Zionism the new anti-Semitism?
  • "I thought I was the only Jew on a Harley Davidson, but I was wrong." — Gil Paul, member of the Hillel's Angels.
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • That sound you hear? That's your childhood going up in smoke.
  • "My husband has been offered a terrific new job in a decent-sized Midwestern city. This is mostly great, except for the fact that we will have to leave our beloved NYC, where one can feel Jewish without trying very hard. He is half-Jewish and was raised with a fair amount of Judaism and respect for our tradition though ultimately he doesn’t feel Jewish in that Larry David sort of way like I do. So, he thinks I am nuts for hesitating to move to this new essentially Jew-less city. Oh, did I mention I am pregnant? Seesaw, this concern of mine is real, right? There is something to being surrounded by Jews, no? What should we do?"
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.