Sisterhood Blog

Q&A: Alan Brody on His Depiction of Jewish Women During WWII

By Elissa Strauss

  • Print
  • Share Share
New Jersey Repertory Co.
A scene from “The Housewives of Mannheim.”

In his new play, “The Housewives of Mannheim,” Alan Brody tells the story of four Jewish women living in a Brooklyn tenement during World War II. With their husbands gone to fight the war, the women begin to break out of their domestic shells and discover their inner lives are much more complicated than they had imagined.

Elissa Strauss: The entire play takes place inside a Jewish women’s kitchen. Why did you chose this setting?

Alan Brody: “The Housewives of Mannheim” is a memory play. I grew up in an apartment house in Flatbush that was very much like the extended community these women live in. The kitchen, of course, was the center of that community. I find that the memory of childhood places is a rich source for the imagination. As a kid, I believed that everything of significance happened in the kitchen. Will I knew there were things happening in other places, too, but I wasn’t allowed there. As a 10-year-old, I believed that my mother and all her friends were most fully themselves in the kitchen — not just because it was a place of nurture but it because it was social place, too.

The characters in the play use the relative freedom bestowed upon them by their husbands’ absence in order to explore their own desires and needs. How was this a period of change for American Jewish women — and for American women in general?

I think it was complicated time, especially for Jewish women because of what we all were learning about what was happening in Europe and their sense of identification with their sisters and their families there. But for all American women, it was a time of shifting consciousness. It’s generally talked about in terms of “Rosie the Riveter” and all the discoveries about independence she represented. But there was a deeper and richer level about the way women identified themselves that happened. During the early part of the Second Wave of feminism, in the late sixties and early seventies, I team-taught a course, called “Images of Women in American Film” with a feminist critic. Our students were the children of the women I write about in “The Housewives of Mannheim.” In revisiting the films that starred Bette Davis, Joan Crawford, Marlene Dietrich, Barbara Stanwyck, Carol Lombard, etc., I discovered that, no matter how the film ended — usually with marriage or reconciliation — the spirit of those movies resided in the images of financially independent women of strength and control over their own bodies. My students were the children of these women and were playing out the suppressed desires that had caught the imagination of their mothers. This was in 1971 and that revelation has stayed with me — and informs the play.

Growing up in Brooklyn, did you know women like the characters in the play?

The characters in “The Housewives of Mannheim” are all based on women I knew — and felt great affection for — when I was a child. I had been trying to find the vehicle for realizing them for a long time.

This play is part of a trilogy. What comes next for these characters?

The next play, “Victory Blues,” deals with what happens when the men come home. The third play, “Are You Popular,” deals with their children in their early teens in high school and the effects of the flight to the suburbs when they are displaced from the world they knew in the city. As I worked on the trilogy, I realized that I was writing something of a cultural history of America from a Jewish-American perspective. I hope I treat all of them with the deep affection and sense of humor I felt for them.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: World War II, The Housewives of Mannheim, Alan Brody

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • The rose petals have settled, and Andi has made her (Jewish?) choice. We look back on the #Bachelorette finale:
  • "Despite the great pain and sadness surrounding a captured soldier, this should not shape the face of this particular conflict – not in making concessions and not in negotiations, not in sobering assessments of this operation’s achievements or the need to either retreat or move forward." Do you agree?
  • Why genocide is always wrong, period. And the fact that some are talking about it shows just how much damage the war in Gaza has already done.
  • Construction workers found a 75-year-old deli sign behind a closing Harlem bodega earlier this month. Should it be preserved?
  • "The painful irony in Israel’s current dilemma is that it has been here before." Read J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis of the conflict:
  • Law professor Dan Markel waited a shocking 19 minutes for an ambulance as he lay dying after being ambushed in his driveway. Read the stunning 911 transcript as neighbor pleaded for help.
  • Happy birthday to the Boy Who Lived! July 31 marks the day that Harry Potter — and his creator, J.K. Rowling — first entered the world. Harry is a loyal Gryffindorian, a matchless wizard, a native Parseltongue speaker, and…a Jew?
  • "Orwell would side with Israel for building a flourishing democracy, rather than Hamas, which imposed a floundering dictatorship. He would applaud the IDF, which warns civilians before bombing them in a justified war, not Hamas terrorists who cower behind their own civilians, target neighboring civilians, and planned to swarm civilian settlements on the Jewish New Year." Read Gil Troy's response to Daniel May's opinion piece:
  • "My dear Penelope, when you accuse Israel of committing 'genocide,' do you actually know what you are talking about?"
  • What's for #Shabbat dinner? Try Molly Yeh's coconut quinoa with dates and nuts. Recipe here:
  • Can animals suffer from PTSD?
  • Is anti-Zionism the new anti-Semitism?
  • "I thought I was the only Jew on a Harley Davidson, but I was wrong." — Gil Paul, member of the Hillel's Angels. http://jd.fo/g4cjH
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.