Sisterhood Blog

Keeping The K-Word Off of Our Site

By Gabrielle Birkner

  • Print
  • Share Share

In recent days, the Forward has been taken to task for disabling comments on a provocative post on our Sisterhood blog. The writer of the post looked at the question of why, two generations after the Holocaust, the most mundane sights, sounds and words — in this case, a German-accented reality television host announcing which contestants would be “eliminated” — could, to this day, evoke Nazi imagery.

We decided to close comments on that particular blog entry not because we were receiving comments that challenged the writer’s thesis or the Forward’s decision to publish the piece or its follow-up. We did so because we were receiving comments that contained personal attacks on, and threats to, the writer and her family.

Many of the comments we receive on a daily basis are thoughtful responses to our coverage, and the often-difficult questions that our articles and blog posts raise. Many others are just plain nonsensical or contain copyright infringements or curse words.

And, I’m sorry to say, quite a lot of them are just plain hateful: Name-calling? Check. Libel? Check? Anti-black racism? Anti-Arab racism? Antisemitism? Holocaust denial? Check, check, check and check.

“THE WORLD WOULD HAVE BEEN SO PEACEFUL IF JEWS DID NOT EXIST. YOU ARE EVIL, YOUR RELIGION IS EVIL AND YOUR GOD IS EVIL,” read one recently deleted post; “I wish to express my outrage that the Holocaust, unlike any other historical event, is not subject to critical revisionist investigation,” read another.

We do our best to get this kind of material off our site in short order. For a small news organization, it’s a big task. Visitors to our Web site are commenting on stories, new and old, at all hours, on all continents (except, maybe, Antarctica). We frequently get comments totaling more than 100,000 words a week.

And monitoring comments is not always as straightforward as deleting the k-word from our Web site. We grapple with questions that our journalistic forebears could not have anticipated: If someone writes a thoughtful response to a Forward story and then pastes a copyrighted story from another publication, should we delete the entire post? Or should we just edit out the part that violates the copyright? If someone responds to a comment that contains an ethnic slur by explaining why such words have no place in civil discourse, should we delete just the comment that contains the slur? Or should we also delete the response to the slur, because there is no longer a context for it?

Monitoring what readers post on a Web site is very time-consuming. Which is why, perhaps, some Jewish Web sites do not allow readers to post comments on any of their stories or blog entries.

The Forward allows comments on most arts, features and opinion stories, on the vast majority of blog posts and on select news stories.

Here is our official commenting policy, published at the bottom of every story and blog post for which comments are enabled:

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, the Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

In addition, we do not feel it is our role to play host to every debate. If visitors to our site want to “debate” the Holocaust, they will likely find their comments deleted. If a commenting section has been usurped by those who prefer to attack or threaten our writers, we may turn off commenting on that story.

Our role in fostering free speech is ensuring that our publication — in print and online — is a place where writers feel safe to take on uncomfortable issues and where dialogue is informed, passionate and civil.

Gabrielle Birkner is Web editor of the Forward. She can be reached at birkner@forward.com.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: Heidi Klum, Comments

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.


Comments
Elana Fri. Nov 6, 2009

Gabrielle You're doing a great job. Managing user generated content has certainly become increasingly challenging, especially for Jewish sites, especially for a site as fast-paced and provocative as yours. You guys are doing really important work. Kudos!

Elana Fri. Nov 6, 2009

BTW - I noticed that on the page of the Tablet's editorial attacking the Forward for deleting some comments, there is no place to put comments AT ALL! A bit hypocritical, I'd say. And if there WAS room there for a comment, what I would write there is: Why are you wasting precious time and space attacking the Sisterhood comment policy? Aren't there more important issues to deal with?

Jack Fri. Nov 6, 2009

The K-word... Kl*m?

It’s a difficult job, editing the comments. What is it about Jewish publications that attract the nutcases? Prob’ly second only to the FORWARD for drawing out bizarro comments is _Biblical Archaeology Review_. My favorite so far is the subscription cancellation because BAR published an illustration of a bare-breasted Canaanite goddess. Of course MOT Hershel Shanks is the editor, so mebbe there’s not so much difference after all.

Gabi Fri. Nov 6, 2009

The k-word, as in an extremely offensive word for a Jew.

Jack Mon. Nov 9, 2009

Oh, _that_ K-word! I missed the original comment before it was cut, which, I guess leads to non sequiturs.

Mebbe in cases where some knowledge of a removed comment is necessary to make sense of subsequent comments, a bracketed editorial note describing the gist without use of the offending remark could be inserted in place of the original comment? For example: [offensive epithet, ed.] or [Argument against minimalist archaeology based on an offensive reference to the Hershel Shanks’ parentage, ed.].

GorNegozete Thu. Feb 4, 2010

http://vkatalogah.ru/ - быстрая регистрация в каталогах




Find us on Facebook!
  • Happy birthday to the Boy Who Lived! July 31 marks the day that Harry Potter — and his creator, J.K. Rowling — first entered the world. Harry is a loyal Gryffindorian, a matchless wizard, a native Parseltongue speaker, and…a Jew?
  • "Orwell would side with Israel for building a flourishing democracy, rather than Hamas, which imposed a floundering dictatorship. He would applaud the IDF, which warns civilians before bombing them in a justified war, not Hamas terrorists who cower behind their own civilians, target neighboring civilians, and planned to swarm civilian settlements on the Jewish New Year." Read Gil Troy's response to Daniel May's opinion piece:
  • "My dear Penelope, when you accuse Israel of committing 'genocide,' do you actually know what you are talking about?"
  • What's for #Shabbat dinner? Try Molly Yeh's coconut quinoa with dates and nuts. Recipe here:
  • Can animals suffer from PTSD?
  • Is anti-Zionism the new anti-Semitism?
  • "I thought I was the only Jew on a Harley Davidson, but I was wrong." — Gil Paul, member of the Hillel's Angels. http://jd.fo/g4cjH
  • “This is a dangerous region, even for people who don’t live there and say, merely express the mildest of concern about the humanitarian tragedy of civilians who have nothing to do with the warring factions, only to catch a rash of *** (bleeped) from everyone who went to your bar mitzvah! Statute of limitations! Look, a $50 savings bond does not buy you a lifetime of criticism.”
  • That sound you hear? That's your childhood going up in smoke.
  • "My husband has been offered a terrific new job in a decent-sized Midwestern city. This is mostly great, except for the fact that we will have to leave our beloved NYC, where one can feel Jewish without trying very hard. He is half-Jewish and was raised with a fair amount of Judaism and respect for our tradition though ultimately he doesn’t feel Jewish in that Larry David sort of way like I do. So, he thinks I am nuts for hesitating to move to this new essentially Jew-less city. Oh, did I mention I am pregnant? Seesaw, this concern of mine is real, right? There is something to being surrounded by Jews, no? What should we do?"
  • "Orwell described the cliches of politics as 'packets of aspirin ready at the elbow.' Israel's 'right to defense' is a harder narcotic."
  • From Gene Simmons to Pink — Meet the Jews who rock:
  • The images, which have since been deleted, were captioned: “Israel is the last frontier of the free world."
  • As J Street backs Israel's operation in Gaza, does it risk losing grassroots support?
  • What Thomas Aquinas might say about #Hamas' tunnels:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.