Mitz-Vote

Shapiro: Administration Opposes Palestinian State Declaration Via U.N.

By Nathan Guttman

  • Print
  • Share Share

A day after the seven-hour meeting between Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in New York, one of the Obama administration’s top Middle East hands, Dan Shapiro, was sent to brief Jewish leaders on where things stand.

It was a classic Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell conference call this morning. It was billed as an off-the-record Q-and-A for the 52 members of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations (but the Forward got a detailed report from a participant just afterward).

Shapiro, in his 15-minute presentation, did not mention the conflict that erupted this week between the Obama administration and the Israeli government over building plans in East Jerusalem, and all but one of the Jewish leaders on the line chose not to ask.

Shapiro has a close relationship with the Jewish community. During the presidential campaign he was Obama’s liaison to the community and since joining the White House as director of Middle East affairs he’s kept his door open to Jewish activists seeking an address to express their thoughts, complaints and concerns about the administration’s policy toward Israel.

Shapiro also knows very well what his audience wants to hear.

In the briefing he mentioned time and again the need for direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, an issue that has been at the center of Netanyahu’s approach to the peace process, and tried to avoid talk about the thorny issue of a settlement freeze.

Instead, he spoke at length about the work the Obama administration is doing to counter attempts to delegitimize Israel, an issue that has become a major theme in the world of Jewish activism.

When asked about the settlement freeze, Shapiro only said that the U.S. still hopes the moratorium on building in the settlements would be extended, but stressed that he could not predict how things will turn out.

The issue of the Jerusalem building contracts, which raised tensions this week and drew harsh responses from President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton, was only discussed following a question from Debra DeLee, president of Americans for Peace Now. Shapiro repeated the administration’s statement about this act being counterproductive and explained that the U.S. is looking for both sides to take steps that will help build trust.

But no one asked a follow-up question; none of the participants tried to quiz Shapiro on what went on in the lengthy discussion between Netanyahu and Clinton (which he attended), and no one pressed on where the relationship between the two countries stands after the falling-out over the Jerusalem building plans.

What was on the minds of the Jewish leaders?

A bevy of issues ranging from Iran sanctions, to delegitimization of Israel, to unilateral Palestinian steps (where Shapiro told Morton Klein of the ZOA that the administration opposes a move to ask the UN Security Council to recognize a Palestinian state, although he did not explicitly say the U.S. would veto it).

Other issues included concerns over the administration’s silence over a letter of support sent by a Palestinian negotiator to the jailed convicted murderer of Israeli minister Rehavam Zeevi (Malcolm Hoenlein asked, and Shapiro said he did not know about the letter), and a question about why Obama did not ask the Muslim world in his speech in Jakarta this week to recognize Israel as a Jewish state (Shapiro: you know our policy of supporting Israel as a Jewish state is clear).

Alan Solow, chair of the Conference of Presidents, which hosted the conference call, ended by assuring Shapiro that everything said in the call would remain off the record. Well, that is one promise that is very hard to keep with a Jewish crowd, but Shapiro probably already knew that.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: Alan Solow, Dan Shapiro, White House

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • Why won't the city give an answer?
  • BREAKING NEWS: Israel has officially suspended peace talks with the Palestinians.
  • Can you guess what the most boring job in the army is?
  • What the foolish rabbi of Chelm teaches us about Israel and the Palestinian unity deal:
  • Mazel tov to Idina Menzel on making Variety "Power of Women" cover! http://jd.fo/f3Mms
  • "How much should I expect him and/or ask him to participate? Is it enough to have one parent reciting the prayers and observing the holidays?" What do you think?
  • New York and Montreal have been at odds for far too long. Stop the bagel wars, sign our bagel peace treaty!
  • Really, can you blame them?
  • “How I Stopped Hating Women of the Wall and Started Talking to My Mother.” Will you see it?
  • Taglit-Birthright Israel is redefining who they consider "Jewish" after a 17% drop in registration from 2011-2013. Is the "propaganda tag" keeping young people away?
  • Happy birthday William Shakespeare! Turns out, the Bard knew quite a bit about Jews.
  • Would you get to know racists on a first-name basis if you thought it might help you prevent them from going on rampages, like the recent shooting in Kansas City?
  • "You wouldn’t send someone for a math test without teaching them math." Why is sex ed still so taboo among religious Jews?
  • Russia's playing the "Jew card"...again.
  • "Israel should deal with this discrimination against Americans on its own merits... not simply as a bargaining chip for easy entry to the U.S." Do you agree?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.