J.J. Goldberg

Israel's Dangerous Musical Chairs: Barak, Bibi, the Flotilla and the Iranian Threat

By J.J. Goldberg

  • Print
  • Share Share

Must reading on Barak’s resignation from Labor: Haaretz military correspondent Amir Oren writes today about the very complicated relationship between Barak’s defection, the retirement of Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi and his replacement by Yoav Galant, and the Turkish flotilla.

Barak defected to save his own skin, of course. Avi Braverman and Buzhi Herzog were about to force a meeting of the Labor Party convention, which possibly would have decided to leave the Netanyahu government and probably would have set a date for a new party leadership primary. That would put a big shadow over Barak’s continued leadership and set the clock ticking on his service as defense minister. As Aluf Benn writes today, Barak very much wants to stay in government because he and Bibi want to keep up the pressure for a military attack on Iran.

IDF Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi was a major obstacle to attacking Iran, because he’s against it. He’s been dismissed without the usual one-year term extension and is to be replaced Feb. 14 by Galant, who is all for the attack. This far, no surprises.

Meir Dagan, the just-departed head of the Mossad, was another obstacle to war. He’s against attacking Iran for the same reason Ashkenazi is against it - it would be enormously costly to Israel in terms of home front damage, Israeli civilian deaths, international condemnation and possibly worse if Iran retaliates with terror attacks against Western targets, which will get Westerners even madder at Israel. None of that is worth risking if the bomb be stopped or delayed without war. That’s why Dagan said last week, on departing the office, that Iran can’t get the bomb until 2015 because of successful covert work and sanctions. His point was that there are other ways besides war that work as well or better (war would only create a couple of years delay, which is what the covert action did) to stop the Iran bomb.

Dagan’s comment infuriated Bibi - who publicly dismissed it as intelligence speculation. And looks as though Bibi’s people planted a pretty vicious Fox News blog note alleging that Dagan had sabotaged Israeli policy for the sake of some personal grandstanding. You could say a lot about Dagan but not that.

Dagan qualified his statement this week, which led to a ton of headlines implying that he misspoke (mostly they said “back-pedaled”). But if you read what he said, he was really saying that the success of covert action so far doesn’t mean anyone can relax - it just means the pressure must continue. That was obvious the first time he spoke. So why did Bibi get upset? Because Bibi doens’t believe pressure - or, for that matter, success, apparently - is enough. He wants war on the table.

That stop-the-next-war message was also the thinking behind the Knesset testimony in November by outgoing military intelligence chief Amos Yadlin, an ally of Ashkenazi, that Tel Aviv is probably the target in the next war. His point was that it’s critically important that there not be a next war. That’s also why Yadlin, Dagan and Shin Bet chief Diskin have all been pushing for the last two years to reopen negotiations with Syria.

Now Dagan has been replaced Tamir Pardo, who reputedly shares the Bibi-Barak appetite for war, and Ashkenazi is about to be replaced by Galant, things will be much easier. The peaceniks will be safely out of the way.

But wait: Galant’s entry is suddenly in doubt. The Green Movement sued in Supreme Court to stop Galant’s promotion on grounds of an alleged shady real estate deal in which he privately appropriated state land to improve access to his personal homestead on Moshav Amikam. The Turkel Commission, which approves senior government appointments, didn’t think the allegations were worth exploring. Now the state comptroller has given the attorney general new documents, which haven’t been made public but were enough to have the attorney general for a freeze on Galant’s promotion. He’s supposed to decide by Feb. 1 whether to dismiss the charges, to call for further investigation-which would mean Galant enters the job under a cloud-or recommend immediate legal action, which would probably derail the promotion altogether. If there isn’t a clean bill of health, Ashkenazi would have to stay on, which is a nightmare scenario for Barak. They could have deputy COS Yair Naveh step in, but he’s new and doesn’t really know his way around the Kirya these days. Or, most likely, they could recall recently retired deputy COS Benny Gantz, who is allied to Ashkenazi but isn’t as formidable a dove.

And get this: If the Turkel commission had the information on Galant but ignored it, why? Was there pressure from Bibi and/or Barak to push the promotion through so they could get on with their sabre-rattling? That’s part of what the attorney general and the Supreme Court are looking at now. If the court decides that the Turkel commission mishandled the Galant appointment, that would severely damage the credibility of the other major commission Judge Turkel is heading up right now, investigating the Flotilla Fiasco. Another nightmare scenario for Defense Minister Barak.

Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: Bibi Netanahu, Ehud Barak, Flotilla, Gabi Ashkenazi, Iranian nukes, Meir Dagan, Yoav Galant

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.