Forward Thinking

Jerusalem Post’s Absurd Visa Waiver Plea

By Anna Momigliano

  • Print
  • Share Share

Getty Images

The Jerusalem Post’s latest editorial wades into the Israel-U.S. debate over travel visas — and comes to some absurd conclusions.

The government of Israel has been trying for a while to reach an agreement with the American authorities allowing Israeli tourists to visit the U.S. for a short time without a visa. The U.S. has always refused to grant Israel such an agreement, despite the fact that most Western nations, including European countries, Australia and New Zealand, already enjoy it as participants in the Visa Waiver Program.

The American government recently explained why Israel’s request was denied: “The Department of Homeland Security and State remain concerned with the unequal treatment that Palestinian Americans and other Americans of Middle Eastern origin experience at Israel’s border and checkpoints, and reciprocity is the most basic condition of the Visa Waiver Program,” State Department spokesman Jen Psaki said March 21.

It’s a known fact that Arab Americans are often subject to harsh security checks upon their arrival in Israel, and in some cases denied entrance in the country. Among others, it happened to Maysoon Zayid, who says she was abused by security guards at the Ben Gurion Airport before her flight back to New Jersey, and Anna Lekas Miller, who was refused entry at the same airport. What’s news, however, is that the American government is making it clear to Israel that such a policy has consequences.

Now the Jerusalem Post has written an editorial asking the State Department to take into account “Israel’s special security challenges,” which make “stringent security measures” necessary. It also complains that Israeli youngsters who want to visit the U.S. have a much harder time entering the country than their Western European counterparts.

Both these assertions have some truth to them: Israel faces much greater security challenges than, say, Italy or France. And I am well aware that, as a European citizen, it’s much easier for me than for my Israeli friends to enter the U.S. They need a visa, I don’t. I get “preferential treatment,” they don’t.

But, make no mistake, “preferential treatment” is exactly what we’re talking about here. Entering a foreign country without a visa is a preferential treatment, not a basic right. The U.S. has said, plain and simple, that it has no intention of granting such treatment to Israelis trying to enter America, so long as Israel discriminates against American citizens trying to enter Israel. “Reciprocity is the most basic condition,” in the State Department’s own words.

The U.S. commitment to protect the interests of its own citizens abroad is well known internationally. So how could the Israeli authorities – or the Jerusalem Post, for that matter – even think that discrimination against Arab Americans is something that the U.S. would be willing to overlook, no matter how pressing the security challenges?

Perhaps that’s the core of the issue: to America, it’s about American citizens. Those individuals whom Israeli authorities see as Arabs who also happen to possess a U.S. passport? To American authorities, they’re just, you know, Americans.

Moreover, the Arab American community is large and constantly growing. According to the Census Bureau, there are 1.8 million people of Middle Eastern descent living in the United States, more than twice what the number was in 2000. The Arab American Institute Foundation puts that figure much higher, at almost 3.7 million.

Given all this, it makes perfect sense that Arab Americans are making their voice heard, just as any other large organized minority would do. So why the surprise at the State Department reaction?

People can think whatever they want about Israel’s security policy and Israel’s right to keep people of Arab descent outside its territory. But to expect the U.S. to turn a blind eye to the treatment of its own citizens, gloss over the condition of reciprocity and accept Israel into the Visa Waiver Program? That’s absurd.

Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: visa waiver program, Jerusalem Post, Israel, Arab Americans

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here:
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.