Forward Thinking

Harvard Hillel Falsely Accuses the Forward

By Larry Cohler Esses

  • Print
  • Share Share

Credit: Flickr/timsackton

Harvard being Harvard, and Hillel being Hillel, it catches an editor’s attention when the executive director of Hillel at Harvard sends out an email blast publicly accusing the Forward of printing an untruth; especially when he does so without the courtesy of telling us or others what that untruth might be — despite our having asked.

In this case, my concern is exacerbated by the fact that the charge is flat out wrong.

It was on Friday, December 13 — as we at the Forward were still waiting to hear back from him after an initial exchange — that Harvard Hillel’s executive director, Rabbi Jonah Steinberg, sent out his email blast to the Hillel center’s thousands of members and supporters.

The email began bluntly:

A recent article in the Jewish Daily Forward, suggesting that the former speaker of the Knesset and past head of the World Zionist Organization, Abraham Burg, was banned from speaking under Harvard Hillel’s roof during his recent visit to Harvard University, was factually incorrect.

I only became aware of Steinberg’s email when a recipient forwarded it to us several hours after it went out. I was quite surprised. Just three days earlier, Rabbi Steinberg had called us to make the same accusation and to demand a correction on a story we had published on December 9. That story dealt in part with a ban promulgated by Hillel International, Harvard Hillel’s parent body, on any involvement in Hillel programming by certain kinds of groups and individuals considered hostile to Israel.

The passage Steinberg objected to in our story stated that Swarthmore College Hillel, in recently voting to defy Hillel International’s ban, had cited as one of its catalysts “a recent decision by the Hillel center at Harvard University to bar Abraham Burg, a former speaker of the Israeli Knesset and Jewish Agency chairman, from speaking under its roof as an immediate cause for its decision. The Harvard Hillel center objected to the fact that Burg’s talk was cosponsored by Harvard College’s Palestinian Solidarity Committee.”

On receiving news of Steinberg’s phone call, I emailed him straight back asking to know what, specifically, was incorrect about this information. The Swarthmore Hillel board had, indisputably, referred to the Harvard episode as one of its catalysts in deciding to toss out Hillel International’s rules. And the episode at Harvard itself had been widely reported at the time. In a November 26 article in the Harvard Crimson, Harvard Hillel Undergraduate President David F. Sackstein was quoted saying, “[It] was agreed upon in advance that this wouldn’t occur at Hillel, in compliance with these organizations’ interpretation of Harvard Hillel’s policy.”

In my email to Steinberg, after reviewing the basics of the incident as it had been reported, I cut and pasted the disputed lines from our story and asked: “Can you specify in what respect this passage is incorrect?”

And then I waited.

But we never received a reply — until we got news of Steinberg’s public email blast to Harvard Hillel’s members and supporters reiterating the very charge that he had declined to support with us.

In actual fact, two paragraphs after condemning our report as inaccurate Steinberg’s email blast confirmed it: After noting that Harvard Hillel had sponsored a talk by Burg at a closed, invitation-only dinner during his campus visit, Steinberg wrote: “Harvard Hillel did decline to co-sponsor a subsequent talk by Mr. Burg, which was held elsewhere on campus, because that particular event was sponsored in part by the Palestine Solidarity Committee, which campaigns for Harvard and the U.S. to divest from and to boycott and sanction Israel (BDS).”

The nonpublic event, of course, was not the one that Swarthmore Hillel referred to, nor, as a consequence, the one we mentioned.

Would Harvard Hillel consider publishing an apology and a correction to its email blast?


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: harvard hillel

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.