Forward Thinking

'Zero Dark Thirty' Brings Torture to Big Screen

By Rachel Kahn-Troster

  • Print
  • Share Share

I recently sat in the dark of a movie theater and watched a human being being tortured. This happened at the beginning of Kathryn Bigelow’s new film “Zero Dark Thirty.” The film’s torture scenes begin the narrative arc toward the May 2011 killing of Osama bin Laden, and so “Zero Dark Thirty” has reopened the debate over the necessity and efficacy of America’s use of torture as an intelligence gathering tool in the years since 9/11. The reaction to the film among my colleagues in the human rights community has been mixed, with many coming out of the movie convinced that it drew a straight line between torture and the ultimate capture of Bin Laden and others believing the opposite.

As an activist against torture, I wanted to judge for myself what message the movie promotes. I don’t normally watch violent films, and I found the torture scenes disturbing, reminding me on a gut level why Jewish tradition considers torture to be a desecration of the image of God. What I saw wasn’t exactly an endorsement of torture — the suspect cracks during a scene of kindness, not cruelty — but rather a failure to condemn it. The crucial piece of intelligence — the name of the courier that ultimately leads to Bin Laden — is revealed after a series of interrogations, some under duress, some under torture. The implication is that torture served to corroborate other, non-coercive methods of eliciting information.

Back in reality, the reaction to the film from experts has been clear-cut. Senator — and former prison of war — John McCain, along with Senators Dianne Feinstein and Carl Levin have reiterated that detainees in CIA custody did not provide the leads that ultimately led to Bin Laden. Torture is a gripping subject for the entertainment industry but movies have perhaps blown out of proportion its significance as a counter terrorism tool.

Oftentimes in war, participants are forced to make decisions that are morally ambiguous. But torture is unambiguous. It is immoral, and it is prohibited by American and international law. And it is ineffective, producing false leads from detainees desperate to make the pain stop. Indeed, “Zero Dark Thirty” brutally demonstrates this ineffectiveness. A detainee, about to be locked into a drawer-sized box, desperately calls out all the names of the days of the week to answer a question to which he does not know the answer.

At the end of the first chapter of Pirkei Avot, Rabban Shimon Ben Gamliel teaches that the world rests on three things: justice, truth, and peace. The image that comes to mind is a stool, with each pillar lending its support to hold up the world. But the verse from Zechariah he cites (8:16) is sequential: Truth precedes justice, and WHICH then leads to peace. Justice is not built on interferences or leaks; it comes from a clear reckoning with our actions. And accountability for those actions is a necessary precondition for peace. Without that sequence of events, the world falters.

And we have faltered. Nearly four years after President Barack Obama signed an executive order restoring America’s commitment to lawful interrogations, American support for the use of torture has actually risen, aided both by media portrayals of torture as effective and by the continued need to feel that anything possible — even the immoral — should be permitted in the name of our safety and national security.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration has not fulfilled its commitment to truth and accountability. The architects of the torture program have not been prosecuted and administration officials continue to defend against its details being released in court (for example, arguing that Guantanamo detainees cannot discuss their torture on the grounds that it is classified.) President Obama’s decision to “look forward, not back” has undermined the first pillar, truth, that would lead to the next steps of justice and peace.

In the months ahead, as a nation we have one of our last chances at learning the truth. On December 13, the Senate Intelligence Committee voted to approve its 6,000-page report on the CIA detention program, which includes details of every single CIA interrogation. Senator Feinstein has said that the report shows that torture did not lead to Bin Laden — but she can’t say much else, because the report is still classified. It needs to be released, with as little redacted as possible — 6,000 pages of blacked out lines will not provide clarity — to counter the pro-torture voices in our midst and bolster alternative intelligence-gathering methods.

If the American people are never provided with the truth, all we will “know” about American use of torture will be from the movies. It is time for us to learn and accept the truth about torture, so that we can move forward on the path towards peace.

Rabbi Rachel Kahn-Troster is Director of North American Programs for Rabbis for Human Rights-North America and a board member of the National Religious Campaign Against Torture.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: osama bin laden, kathryn bigelow, barack obama, al qaeda

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.