Forward Thinking

Censorship at the 14th Street Y!

By Jay Michaelson

  • Print
  • Share Share

As reported in these pages last week, the 14th Street Y pulled the plug on a controversial Shavuot event sponsored by the left-wing advocacy group Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP). The Y did so at the eleventh hour, and on the pretext that the Y was concerned about large crowds of attendees and media.

Which is absurd. In the end, JVP drew about thirty people to the event, which was held in a nearby park, and had reserved a room for 75. Anyway, no one could reasonably expect their event to be of interest to more than a few dozen people, especially on Memorial Day weekend and Shavuot; it was not marketed as a mass event, and in the end no media showed up at all. This excuse doesn’t pass the laugh test.

Obviously, the real reason JVP was banned from the Y is that it is controversial — but there’s more to it than that. The JVP program, “Go and Learn,” was meant to discuss the Boycott/Divestment/Sanctions (BDS) movement, which targets Israel economically for its policies regarding the Palestinians. The BDS movement is often depicted as anti-Israel, and indeed many of its loudest proponents are just that. It also doesn’t help that JVP, as an organization, refuses to take a stand on the “one state” solution for Israel/Palestine, which would effectively wipe the Jewish state off the map. This is an organization far to the left of the Jewish mainstream (and, not that it matters, but far to the left of my own views as well).

But then again, according to its website, “The 14th Street Y is a thriving and dynamic community center located in the heart of the East Village.” Isn’t being a community center about hosting events that are of community interest, even if many other people find them problematic? And isn’t the East Village, of all places, full of folks (Jewish or otherwise) who support BDS, or are interested in learning more about it?

“Go and Learn” wasn’t an action, wasn’t a protest, wasn’t a rally filled with incendiary speakers. It was billed as an informational session and a discussion, i..e., it’s exactly what institutions like the Y should be promoting. JVP’s YouTube video about the controversy makes that quite clear.

The deeper reason why JVP was banned is that it, and BDS, have become litmus tests for Jewish funders seeking to draw lines around permissible discourse about Israel. In the San Francisco Bay Area, JVP and BDS are the specific examples of an organization and a position that cannot be supported or hosted at a federation-sponsored facility or program. To the best of my knowledge, UJA-Federation of Greater New York has not formally adopted the Bay Area guidelines, but informally, they are used all the time.

So, while I’d like to say “Shame on the 14th Street Y” for their cowardice, consider the choice the Y faced. It may be that to have allowed JVP to hold their program would’ve cost the Y the support of the federation — let alone many donors. That’s a tough call to make: between censorship on the one hand, and financial hara-kiri on the other.

The real shame, then, lies with those who have supported such gag rules in the first place. These rules are offensive to Jewish community, to values of Jewish peoplehood, and to the missions of organizations like the 14th Street Y. They create a climate of fear and suspicion, as Jewish professionals wonder what opinions are safe to express. They’re also wrong-headed. Squelching debate doesn’t make JVP look less legitimate; it makes the Jewish institutional world seem less legitimate. So much for dissent, pluralism, and the notion that different opinions (elu v’elu) may both represent the word of God. We look like a bunch of scared parochialists defending an illegitimate policy with the tools of censorship and condemnation.

If Israel’s policies are legitimate, the Jewish community should not be afraid of respectful debate about them. And if BDS is illegitimate, we should encourage and participate in debates which show it to be so. Running away from BDS, clapping our hands over our communal eyes and ears, makes it look more important and legitimate than it is. (In an upcoming column in this newspaper, I will state my case against BDS in more detail. I believe it to be both wrongheaded and deeply problematic.)

Now, supporters of the gag rule will say that to even talk about BDS is anti-Semitic, and that JVP’s supporters are, by definition, self-hating Jews. We wouldn’t allow the KKK at the 14th Street Y, they’ll say, so why would we allow this hate group instead. But these statements are fallacious and insulting. BDS is a policy, and advocating it is a legitimate viewpoint (again, one with which I strongly disagree) based on a judgment of the Israel/Palestine crisis, and Israel’s responsibility for it. Doing so may be wrong, but it is not hate speech, and as JVP is manifestly not a self-hating organization. Just watch some of their videos for yourself. These are people who have strongly-held convictions about Israel, convictions which may indeed strike many of us as misguided, even offensive. But they are also our people, our sisters and brothers and siblings. They ought to be able to meet in our community centers.

Or at least, we should let the centers decide that for themselves, and not fear that their many other valuable programs would be put into jeopardy if they allowed this one to go on. At least then, if the 14th Street Y said no, the community it serves could hold its leadership accountable.

Policies like this one are designed to strengthen our community, and its commitment to the State of Israel. Yet each time they are enforced, we get weaker and weaker.

Permalink | | Share | Email | Print

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here:
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • "Mark your calendars: It was on Sunday, July 20, that the momentum turned against Israel." J.J. Goldberg's latest analysis on Israel's ground operation in Gaza:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.