Forward Thinking

I'm The Fool. Ackerman's Not Buying the Mets

By Josh Nathan-Kazis

  • Print
  • Share Share
forward illustration/nate lavey
Rep. Gary Ackerman

Queens Rep. Gary Ackerman isn’t running for reelection, and the Queens Tribune seemed to be the only media outlet that knew why.

A column, penned by Tribune publisher Michael Schenkler, reported that Ackerman had signed on as a managing partner of a group of investors that had reached a deal to buy the New York Mets from the Wilpon family.

It sounded like a plausible explanation for Ackerman’s surprising decision to retire from Congress, and an interesting twist in the tale of the Wilpons, who lost big in the Bernie Madoff scam.

Or so I thought. At an overwrought editor’s urging, I started looking into the report.

It seemed a little strange that the paper posted the piece Thursday, yet no other media outlets had picked it up. Maybe no one has the Queens Tribune on their Google alerts, I thought.

I was halfway through putting out a round of phone calls when I found out the truth: It was all a (very) pre-April Fools Day joke.

The truth is: Ackerman is still retiring but he isn’t buying the Amazin’s anytime soon. (Given their perennial woes, that might not be a bad thing. But I digress).

The mildly eccentric Jewish Democrat, who wears a fresh white carnation every day and lives in a houseboat, told reporters that he felt it was time to move on. “I am tired of flying back and forth to Washington,” Ackerman said, according to a story in the Queens Chronicle.

Ackerman has served in Congress since 1983, making him long-serving in real terms but a newcomer compared to fellow New York City Democrat Charlie Rangel, who was first elected to Congress in 1971.

There was buzz that Ackerman could lose his seat during the lengthy and convoluted redistricting process that, like a game of musical chairs, promised to knock out two New York state incumbents. But Ackerman pulled through, winding up with a district that included turf he had represented in the past. He was expected to breeze through the November elections, settling in for another two years in a comfortable Queens district.

Instead Ackerman stepped back, leaving space for a potentially bruising Democratic primary in the new district between Assemblyman Rory Lancman, Assemblywoman Grace Meng, City Councilwoman Elizabeth Crowley, and potentially others.

All of this adds up to a small puzzle that the Queens Tribune story seemed to solve. Ackerman is a huge Mets fan who, last May, proposed a bill that would have protected the Mets’ current owners from the trustee in the Madoff bankruptcy, who was seeking to claw back profits that the owners had made on their Madoff investments. The Mets owners came to an unlikely settlement with the trustee earlier this week.

There’s also a back story to the Tribune spoof. Ackerman founded the newspaper before being elected to congress and the publisher is a longtime friend.

When I called Ackerman’s office about the story they referred me to an editorial published in the same issue which doesn’t seem to appear online, and which describes the column as the publisher “having a little fun at his friend’s expense with an early April Fool’s joke.”

Very early. Schenkler didn’t respond to an email and a phone call, so I couldn’t ask him why the paper ran a prank column on March 22, way before most discerning reporters would smell a prank.

Upon rereading the piece, there were clues. For instance, the last line: “[L]ook for the big formal announcement on April 1. You’d be a fool to miss it.”

Oops. I guess I’m the fool.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: wilpon, schenkler, retirement, queens tribune, new york mets, gary ackerman, bernie madoff

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • It’s over. The tyranny of the straight-haired, button nosed, tan-skinned girl has ended. Jewesses rejoice!
  • It's really, really, really hard to get kicked out of Hebrew school these days.
  • "If Netanyahu re-opens the settlement floodgates, he will recklessly bolster the argument of Hamas that the only language Israel understands is violence."
  • Would an ultra-Orthodox leader do a better job of running the Met Council?
  • So, who won the war — Israel or Hamas?
  • 300 Holocaust survivors spoke out against Israel. Did they play right into Hitler's hands?
  • Ari Folman's new movie 'The Congress' is a brilliant spectacle, an exhilarating visual extravaganza and a slapdash thought experiment. It's also unlike anything Forward critic Ezra Glinter has ever seen. http://jd.fo/d4unE
  • The eggplant is beloved in Israel. So why do Americans keep giving it a bad rap? With this new recipe, Vered Guttman sets out to defend the honor of her favorite vegetable.
  • “KlezKamp has always been a crazy quilt of gay and straight, religious and nonreligious, Jewish and gentile.” Why is the klezmer festival shutting down now?
  • “You can plagiarize the Bible, can’t you?” Jill Sobule says when asked how she went about writing the lyrics for a new 'Yentl' adaptation. “A couple of the songs I completely stole." Share this with the theater-lovers in your life!
  • Will Americans who served in the Israeli army during the Gaza operation face war crimes charges when they get back home?
  • Talk about a fashion faux pas. What was Zara thinking with the concentration camp look?
  • “The Black community was resistant to the Jewish community coming into the neighborhood — at first.” Watch this video about how a group of gardeners is rebuilding trust between African-Americans and Jews in Detroit.
  • "I am a Jewish woman married to a non-Jewish man who was raised Catholic, but now considers himself a “common-law Jew.” We are raising our two young children as Jews. My husband's parents are still semi-practicing Catholics. When we go over to either of their homes, they bow their heads, often hold hands, and say grace before meals. This is an especially awkward time for me, as I'm uncomfortable participating in a non-Jewish religious ritual, but don't want his family to think I'm ungrateful. It's becoming especially vexing to me now that my oldest son is 7. What's the best way to handle this situation?" http://jd.fo/b4ucX What would you do?
  • Maybe he was trying to give her a "schtickle of fluoride"...
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.