Forward Thinking

The March to AIPAC

By Nathan Guttman

  • Print
  • Share Share
Getty Images
Last year’s conference

It is still more than a week away, but AIPAC’s annual policy conference is already creating a buzz in the political world. Every year organizers promise this will be the biggest pro-Israel gathering ever, but this time around the American Israel Public Affairs Committee has really outdone itself, with 13,000 participants expected to take part at the three-day parley opening on March 4. Headlining the event will be President Obama, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, Israel’s president Shimon Peres and the Republican presidential candidates, not to mention congressional leaders and just about anyone who has anything to do with Israel, politics and policy.

But with success come a few headaches.

First, for Republican candidates. The AIPAC conference is taking place just before Super Tuesday on March 6, when ten states hold primary elections. So what is a candidate to do? Fly back to Washington and give up valuable campaigning time in the voting states? Or perhaps skip the AIPAC conference and focus on the voters? It is a tough decision that all three leading candidates (Ron Paul does not seem to be relevant for the AIPAC crowd) need to make. Speaking at the conference can make some political sense, since it is a great venue to show off pro-Israel credentials and to deliver some punches at the Obama administration. On the other hand, staying on the ground in the states that are voting the next day could be a sounder decision, given the high stakes involved. Newt Gingrich already decided to make the trip to Washington. No word yet from Romney and Santorum.

But even before any of the candidates RSVP’d, the idea of Republican presidential hopefuls speaking at the AIPAC conference is causing some unease on the Democratic side. Informed sources said Democrats are now worried that three Republicans will get a chance to bash Obama in front of the pro-Israel crowd while only one Democrat — the President himself — will be there to respond. AIPAC has yet to list any of the Republican candidates on its schedule for the conference.

In 2008 AIPAC invited three candidates to speak: John McCain, who had already clinched the Republican nomination and both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, who had just thrown in the towel in her bid to win the Democratic ticket. In 2004, however, President George W. Bush spoke alone and Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry did not address the conference.

Beyond the political maneuvering, the unprecedented number of participants also poses a pretty big logistical problem: How do you sit 13,000 people for dinner in one place? The AIPAC gala dinner, usually held on the second evening of the conference, has long become a must-attend event for all Washington political movers and shakers, with more than half of Congress showing up each year alongside ambassadors, lobbyists and pundits. This year, due to the large turnout, the gala dinner will be take place without a dinner. Instead, before entering the hall to hear the keynote address, guests will be divided into smaller cocktail parties where politicians can mingle with their top donors for a give and take that is, after all, what this conference is all about.


Permalink | | Share | Email | Print | Filed under: AIPAC, Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu, Election 2012, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.




Find us on Facebook!
  • Angelina Jolie changed everything — but not just for the better:
  • Prime Suspect? Prime Minister.
  • Move over Dr. Ruth — there’s a (not-so) new sassy Jewish sex-therapist in town. Her name is Shirley Zussman — and just turned 100 years old.
  • From kosher wine to Ecstasy, presenting some of our best bootlegs:
  • Sara Kramer is not the first New Yorker to feel the alluring pull of the West Coast — but she might be the first heading there with Turkish Urfa pepper and za’atar in her suitcase.
  • About 1 in 40 American Jews will get pancreatic cancer (Ruth Bader Ginsberg is one of the few survivors).
  • At which grade level should classroom discussions include topics like the death of civilians kidnapping of young Israelis and sirens warning of incoming rockets?
  • Wanted: Met Council CEO.
  • “Look, on the one hand, I understand him,” says Rivka Ben-Pazi, a niece of Elchanan Hameiri, the boy that Henk Zanoli saved. “He had a family tragedy.” But on the other hand, she said, “I think he was wrong.” What do you think?
  • How about a side of Hitler with your spaghetti?
  • Why "Be fruitful and multiply" isn't as simple as it seems:
  • William Schabas may be the least of Israel's problems.
  • You've heard of the #IceBucketChallenge, but Forward publisher Sam Norich has something better: a #SoupBucketChallenge (complete with matzo balls!) Jon Stewart, Sarah Silverman & David Remnick, you have 24 hours!
  • Did Hamas just take credit for kidnapping the three Israeli teens?
  • "We know what it means to be in the headlines. We know what it feels like when the world sits idly by and watches the news from the luxury of their living room couches. We know the pain of silence. We know the agony of inaction."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.