Campaign Confidential

Ed Koch: U.S. 'Safer' With Obama

By Brett Lieberman

  • Print
  • Share Share

Former New York Mayor Ed Koch, who bucked the Democratic Party and endorsed President Bush over Democrat John Kerry in 2004, has no regrets about that decision. Kerry did not fully understood the need to support Israel at the time, he says.

“That is not an issue in this election,” Koch writes in a statement today. “Both parties and their candidates have made clear, before and during this election campaign their understanding of the need to support Israel and oppose acts of terrorism waged against it by Hamas and other Muslim supporters of terrorism.”

For him, it comes down to who will “best protect and defend America.”

The answer, according to Koch, is that “the country is safer in the hands of Barack Obama, leader of the Democratic Party and protector of the philosophy of that party.”

Besides issues such as civil rights, health care, taxation and abortion rights, Koch writes that “Frankly, it would scare me if [GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin] were to succeed John McCain in the presidency.”

Here’s Koch’s full statement:

Ed Koch Presidential Endorsement September 9, 2008

The time has come to declare whom I will be voting for.

When I made my decision four years ago and supported the reelection of George W. Bush, I said at the time the overwhelming issue for me was international Islamic terrorism, including al-Qaeda.

The goal of Islamic terrorists was and still is to reestablish the Caliphate encompassing most of the Muslims living in a host of nations from Spain to Indonesia and placing them under a single religious leader with full authority over the civil affairs of the countries, in the style of Iran.

That goal includes the deaths or forced conversions of Christians and Jews as infidels or the payment by them of tribute, and the elimination of the State of Israel.

In 2004, I concluded that the one person running for president who understood that danger best and was prepared to fight it and defend America and its allies was George W. Bush.

Even though he is now at a low ebb in popularity, I have no regrets for having campaigned and voted for him.

I said at the time I didn’t agree with him on a single domestic issue and so far as I can currently see that is still true with the exception of drilling for oil off our coasts and building nuclear energy plants.

I believe that Bush and Tony Blair, Bush’s main international ally with regard to the war in Iraq and against Islamic terrorism, will be redeemed by history.

President Harry Truman was reviled when he left office, but is now honored for his courage and vision.

Now, once again, I have to make a decision to either endorse the Democratic ticket of Obama and Biden or support the Republican ticket of McCain and Palin.

I am 83 years old.

If I am lucky, I may yet vote not only in this election, but in the presidential election of 2012 and perhaps, if luckier, even in that of 2016.

I believe I must vote my conscience, and that means for the presidential candidate who in my estimation will best protect the U.S. over the next four years.

I personally know two of those running:

Joe Biden and John McCain.

I like and admire them both.

John McCain is a genuine war hero and patriot.

Joe Biden is a friend well versed in foreign and domestic affairs, who had made judgment calls on domestic and foreign policy and legislation that I agree with.

I do not personally really know the Democratic presidential candidate, Barack Obama, having spoken to him only once and briefly, or the Republican vice presidential candidate, Sarah Palin.

One foreign policy issue that particularly concerned me in 2004 was the security of Israel.

I thought in 2004 that issue was better left to President George W. Bush, and I believe I was right.

President Bush understood the need to support the security of Israel and did so.

I did not feel that way about Senator John Kerry.

That is not an issue in this election.

Both parties and their candidates have made clear, before and during this election campaign their understanding of the need to support Israel and oppose acts of terrorism waged against it by Hamas and other Muslim supporters of terrorism.

So the issue for me is who will best protect and defend America.

I have concluded that the country is safer in the hands of Barack Obama, leader of the Democratic Party and protector of the philosophy of that party.

Protecting and defending the U.S. means more than defending us from foreign attacks.

It includes defending the public with respect to their civil rights, civil liberties and other needs, e.g., national health insurance, the right of abortion, the continuation of Social Security, gay rights, other rights of privacy, fair progressive taxation and a host of other needs and rights.

If the vice president were ever called on to lead the country, there is no question in my mind that the experience and demonstrated judgment of Joe Biden is superior to that of Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin is a plucky, exciting candidate, but when her record is examined, she fails miserably with respect to her views on the domestic issues that are so important to the people of the U.S., and to me.

Frankly, it would scare me if she were to succeed John McCain in the presidency.

I reiterate the question each of us must answer in making our choice, who will best protect and defend America, domestically and with respect to the literal defense of the country?

I hope I’ve made the right decision but only time will tell.

Whoever wins should and, I hope, will, following the election, receive the support of all Americans, no matter how they voted, especially in these perilous times.

God Bless America and the next president and vice president of the U.S.



Comments
Adrienne Pesin Tue. Sep 9, 2008

I applaud you and restrained making the same comments when I stood behind you at Fairway last week. McCain/Palin lie about their records, will do anything to win, and score poorly on torture, war, diplomatic skill and cultural knowledge, healthcare, the needs of the middle class, what they would do to the Supreme Court and the rights of women - the prospect of either of them leading terrifies me. Palin is a religious, self-righteous zealot who outright lies, is cruel to the environment and the animals who are part of it, and is a total hypocrite regarding the education of her children. McCain is not an analytical thinker and is hanging onto his POW experience, which, while admirable, in no way qualifies anyone to lead the free world. He doesn't understand economics or the need to deal diplomatically with other cultures in order to avoid, not extol, war. He doesn't listen to anyone but the far right nuts!

Karen Disner Mon. Sep 15, 2008

I respect and applaud Ed Koch's decision, and beautiful esplanation.

twiniaorier Fri. Apr 10, 2009

Отличный блог, интересное и полезное содержание!

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?






















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.