Campaign Confidential

Is Carter's Convention Role a 'Backward Compliment'?

By Brett Lieberman

  • Print
  • Share Share

UPDATED 7:02 p.m. Mountain Time

Much has been made of the balancing act that Barack Obama’s campaign has had to walk as it tries to honor and respect Bill and Hillary Clinton without detracting from what should be Obama’s moment during this week’s Democratic National Convention. But the role of another former president is proving equally vexing.

The inclusion of former President Jimmy Carter during tonight’s Democratic National Convention program has created an awkward situation for Democrats, who don’t want to slight a former Democratic president but also fear offending Jewish voters and other Israel supporters.

Carter has called Israel’s treatment of Palestinians “one of the greatest human rights crimes on earth,” as the Republican Jewish Coalition reminded in a news release calling on Democrats to pull Carter from tonight’s convention line-up.

“Jimmy Carter’s long history of anti-Israel bias has rendered him unfit to address the Democratic Convention,” RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks said in a statement.

Democrats’ solution: Carter’s contributions were recognized during a tribute video on his recovery efforts in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, but he had no speaking role.

In his taped remarks, Carter predicted an Obama administration would do more to help the poor.

The former president and former First Lady Rossalyn Carter received a warm reception and the first standing ovation of the night from delegates when they walked onto the convention stage and the sounds of Ray Charles’ “Georgia on my Mind” filled the Pepsi Center.

That didn’t sit well with all delegates such as Florida state Sen. Nan H. Rich.

“He hasn’t shown respect to Israel and many of the Jewish constituencies here based on the things he has done,” said the Florida delegate who planned to walk out of the convention hall.

Rich said she respects the presidency, but not Carter.

Carter was originally scheduled to address delegates. Some Jewish leaders saw the change in plans as an effort by Democratic officials to address concerns about Carter.

“If we didn’t matter they wouldn’t have all this focus and preoccupation on Carter’s speaking,” Rabbi Marc Schneier said this morning, adding that “It’s a backward compliment to the Jewish community.”

“If there’s anything positive it’s that the Obama campaign acknowledges how much of a lightening rod Jimmy Carter is within the Jewish community,” he said.

Of course, a lot will depend on what Carter has to say, according to Schneier and other Jewish leaders who hope the former president will steer clear of foreign policy matters.



Comments
rj Mon. Aug 25, 2008

Having Carter speak at the convention shows how inept this campaign has become. What possible benefit can this do for Obama. It hurts him with the Jewish community and brings no benefit to him. Short of displaying Nazi flags at the convention, I can't think of anything more harmful.

Raed Kami Thu. Aug 28, 2008

Carter is the heart and soul of the Democratic Party. As a statesman, he knows that the apartheid state of Israel is the major impediment to world peace. Obama recognizes that Iran has legitimate security concerns about an Israili invasion, just as gobbled up the Palestinian territories. Only Obama is strong enough to stand up to the neocons who have hijacked the US and will free the US from the zionsit duct tape that has bound you. If I were an American, I would vote enthusiastically for Obama. He will bring the US into the realm of international justice and stop you from flaunting international law

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?






















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.