Bintel Blog

The Jewish Press vs. Albert Einstein

By Daniel Treiman

  • Print
  • Share Share

Was Albert Einstein “the first post-Zionist”? Jason Maoz, editor of the right-wing Orthodox weekly, The Jewish Press, thinks so. In fact, Maoz goes so far as to suggest that the famed physicist could properly be labeled a “villain.”

“Einstein, because of his iconic status as the 20th century’s preeminent scientific genius, has largely escaped Jewish criticism for his antipathy to the notion of a Jewish state,” writes Maoz, who isn’t one to give the wild-haired physicist a free pass.

Alas, Maoz presents a very selective presentation of the relevant facts, cherry-picking quotes that paint Einstein in the worst possible light. True, Einstein was critical of political Zionism and disliked the idea of a specifically Jewish state. But Einstein also lent his voice and his celebrity to the Zionist cause of establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine — and he did so at the early date of 1920. He remained a consistent and strong advocate of the effort to settle Jews in Palestine, and he publicly berated the Diaspora anti-Zionists of the American Council for Judaism, calling the group “a pitiable attempt to obtain favor and toleration from our enemies by betraying true Jewish ideals.” And when Israel was founded, he hailed the newborn state’s achievements, expressing his “joy and admiration” in a 1949 radio address.

Did history prove Einstein naïve and wrong (perhaps even somewhat dangerously so) on the question of a Jewish state? Certainly. His almost-unshakable faith in the immediate possibility of harmonious co-existence between Jews and Arabs in Palestine led him to overlook certain harsh realities. Einstein believed that if not for the policies of Britain, the Arabs of Palestine would have peacefully accepted the mass-influx of Jewish immigrants. This was clearly unrealistic. And that is why a Jewish state — with a Jewish army — was ultimately a historical necessity.

So he wasn’t exactly a Zionist visionary. But was he a villain? Hardly. Einstein was, for all his genius, human. He turned out to be less right than some Jews when it came to Zionism, and more right than others. And the stress Einstein placed on the vital importance of achieving co-existence and peace with the Arabs of Palestine was hardly villainous. It was, in fact, prescient.

So, if we are to stand in judgment of Einstein on this question, let us take into account the full historical record. (A good source, by the way, on Einstein’s views on Zionism and other political issues is a new volume titled “Einstein on Politics,” edited by David E. Rowe and Robert Schulmann.)

Interestingly, in the very same issue of The Jewish Press, there is a much more respectful remembrance of the murdered Jewish extremist Rabbi Meir Kahane, in the form of a softball interview with his widow (which, to be fair, was not conducted by Maoz). Maybe the Jewish Defense League founder escapes The Jewish Press’s criticism for his hateful and violent legacy because he was a columnist for the paper. Or perhaps The Jewish Press simply prefers Kahane’s vicious views to the humanism of Albert Einstein.



Comments
Zionist Wed. Apr 16, 2008

I disagree with the Forward's approach. Though I'm not a supporter of Meir Kahane, he had far more knowledge of Zionism and modern Israel's problems than Einstein's superficial knowledge. Well-off non-Israeli Jews like Einstein have no business making international prononcements which can serve the anti-Zionist anti-Semites. I find it very unprofessional for the Forward to take sides by the reference to Kahane's "hateful and violent legacy" rather than simply reporting views of various sides straight-forwardly.

Diane Trachtenberg Sat. Apr 12, 2008

Einstein's attitude towards the establishment of a Jewish state changed over time. The Holocaust was a big influence. His views would not fall in the category of "antipathy." He said, once, that a state by/for Jews would be problematic because the Jews, in their own state, would reveal their strengths--and weaknesses. This was the point of Zionism--that we be a nation, like all others. But Einstein wasn't sure that was a good idea. In addition, he had reservations about the possibility of peace in such a nation. His reservations were not, necessarily, anti-Zionist or antagonistic to Jewish culture or survival.

Yisrael Medad Sun. Apr 13, 2008

Talking about selective quotating, how come Einstein's barracking letter of dispargement and extreme outlandish criticisnm of Menachem begin, in the NYTimes of all platforms was left out of the BB commentary (see: http://www.globalwebpost.com/farooqm/study_res/einstein/nyt_letter.html). Here's one of the opening sentences: "(Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties." Any Jew who could have written that about another was not only 'post' but way past as well.

ASC Fri. Apr 11, 2008

Nicely done, Daniel.

Fred Jerome Fri. Apr 3, 2009

I certainly do not agree with Jason Maoz or The Jewish Press, but the fact is that Einstein's views on Israel have been generally distorted or ignored by most of the mass media, and I have to say that your single line that he hailed the Jewish state's achievements and expressed "joy and admiration" is far from the actual picture. Certainly Rowe and Schulmann's book that you cite gives a more comprehensive view, and you may find that my forthcoming book, Einstein on Israel and Zionism, about to be published by St. Martin's Press, will offer more useful (including some previously unpublished) Einstein statements. There can be no doubt that Einstein would be profoundly upset, not to say angry, about the policies and practices of today's Israeli officials.

Sincerely,

Fred Jerome

bonnie Thu. May 14, 2009

hey yall peeps this site is pimp!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?






















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.